TEC Forum Archive

🗃️ Archive

Macro Hatch Param Discussion

Started · 6 posts preserved

Post your favorite proposals here and let’s debate them!

image

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

I forked Sem’s proposal to make:

I want to shill the idea of a very high support required (90% min) so that we as a community have a high consensus threshold for the next step… imagine if 25% of the people vote no to the commons upgrade… that is a bad sign! We shouldn’t let it pass.

end rant

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

I think they are cool and if the strategy its keep the frogs out by not advertising it that might be a good solution, but with a 15 CSTK ratio someone can pay 500 DAI for the membership adds +15k and gamble with it.

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

I just submitted mine, it was so much fun to try on the token engineer hat 🤠

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

I love that I chose the hatch tribute very low for the same reason you set it very high 😅
And I thought I had a high quorum but I just see how I was shy with it! I actually really like it very high like yours

Common Crawl capture, 2026-02-13

Sources for this page (4 captures)

Original address: https://forum.tecommons.org/t/macro-hatch-param-discussion/365

  • 20210624151747 https://forum.tecommons.org/t/macro-hatch-param-discussion/365
  • 20210624151747 (Common Crawl) https://forum.tecommons.org/t/macro-hatch-param-discussion/365
  • 20260213071600 https://forum.tecommons.org/t/macro-hatch-param-discussion/365
  • 20260213071600 (Common Crawl) https://forum.tecommons.org/t/macro-hatch-param-discussion/365